Level39

Footage accompanying a New York Times article critical of Bitcoin mining appears to have been manipulated to reinforce the paper’s bias.

A recent editorial attack on Bitcoin mining by The New York Times raises questions about its journalistic integrity and editorial process.

In testimony before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, actor Ben McKenzie and professor Hillary Allen offered inaccuracies about Bitcoin.

Enriching people for low-energy services won’t save the environment, only proof of work builds a sustainable future.

Bitcoin can breathe new life into Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC), a 150-year old renewable technology stymied by economies of scale.

One does not simply change Bitcoin’s code, as the Change The Code campaign ridiculously requests.

Bitcoin environmental concerns are often portrayed in misleading and exaggerated ways contrary to proper research.

PlanB’s S2F/S2FX models are scientifically invalid and have fundamental issues that may lead investors astray.

Measuring Bitcoin’s environmental impact with “energy per transaction” is misleading and disingenuous.

U.S. National Defense Fellow Jason Lowery argues that Bitcoin’s proof-of-work consensus model can replace our reliance on military might for digital property and money.