Fed Banker Tries Criticizing Bitcoin, Ends Up Perfectly Describing The Fed

by

         Fed Banker Tries Criticizing Bitcoin, Ends Up Perfectly Describing The Fed

In an article for Fox News, senior economist Francois Velde of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago describes Bitcoin. “Although some of the enthusiasm for Bitcoin is driven by a distrust of state-issued currency, it is hard to imagine a world where the main currency is based on an extremely complex code understood by only a few and controlled by even fewer, without accountability, arbitration or recourse,” Velde wrote.

In his attempt to criticize Bitcoin, Federal Reserve banker Velde actually summed up fairly well everything that’s wrong with his own employer, and in doing so outlines the threat Bitcoin poses to it.

To address Velde’s first criticism, Bitcoin’s underlying code, like all programs, does require some knowledge of programming to understand and manipulate. But the charge that it’s understood by only a few and controlled by even fewer is patently absurd. First, the code underlying Bitcoin is completely open-source. What that means is that every developer has access to the code, and can manipulate it to create new currencies, or entirely new solutions, at will.

In fact, the developers are currently modifying the Bitcoin protocol to create new platforms which do everything from fight censorship through a new TOR-like encrypted internet to rebuilding Twitter to evade the NSA.

As for the claim that Bitcoin is “controlled by even fewer” people, I suppose it’s difficult to get fewer people in control of Bitcoin than zero. No one controls Bitcoin, because it’s a protocol. Its operations are decentralized over thousands of computers, with no one computer or group of computers having any control whatsoever.

It’s true that there’s no central authority users can present with Bitcoin transaction disagreements. It’s certainly possible to get screwed and have to eat the cost. But this is an issue which can easily be solved. For example, online drug marketplace Silk Road holds Bitcoins internally until goods arrive. In this manner, Silk Road replaced the broken kneecaps endemic to the meatspace drug trade with bad user reviews and quick refunds.

But if anyone wants the money they’ve lost through currency inflation back due to the fact that the Fed has in no way, shape or form delivered on the promise of low unemployment or avoiding economic crises, there is literally zero, to quote, “accountability, arbitration or recourse.”

The value, availability and stability of the US dollar is in the hands of unaccountable private bankers, and there’s nothing we can do about it. Of course, “some of the enthusiasm for Bitcoin is driven by a distrust of state-issued currency.”

But in no way is it it “hard to imagine a world where the main currency is based on an extremely complex code understood by only a few and controlled by even fewer, without accountability, arbitration or recourse.” That’s exactly the world we live in under the US dollar. And it’s exactly the world Bitcoin has the potential to improve.

Recommended

Op Ed: Defining Decentralization: How Ambiguity Continues to Divide Crypto

In the pursuit of mass adoption, decentralization shouldn’t be our goal, but instead a means to achieve the many different, and equally important, goals that exist for cryptocurrency users.

Paul Puey

Op Ed: Why It’s Unsafe to Store Private Crypto Keys in the Cloud

Unless cybersecurity becomes part of the fabric of blockchain and crypto with stakeholders taking it more seriously, it will take much longer for this amazing technology and currency to get the mass adoption that it deserves.

Paul Walsh

Op Ed: How Bitcoin’s Protocol of Peace Can End the Nuclear Age

Bitcoin offers an alternative to a universal security system backed by men with guns. It creates a new model of security based on cryptographic proof that can resist unlimited applications of violence, making a bulletproof network.

Nozomi Hayase

Op Ed: Bitcoin Mining Attacks Are Overblown

The question here is whether bitcoin mining is a single point of failure. Could a government or other authority control Bitcoin through controlling a single entity in mining? What would it actually take to “take over”?

Jimmy Song