Announcing a Return to our Roots: The All-New Bitcoin Magazine

Crypto-anarchists Versus Government, Who Will Win The War to Regulate Bitcoin?


         Crypto-anarchists Versus Government, Who Will Win The War to Regulate Bitcoin?

Earlier this year Benjamin Lawsky, New York’s financial services superintendent, said he intended to initiate the biggest move towards regulating bitcoin.

Lawsky told CNN Money that he planned do this by administering “BitLicenses” to companies dealing with bitcoins, allegedly to protect the public from fraud.

Without explaining how exactly, Lawsky said he’d impose regulation on Bitcoin-related businesses, similar to those that govern banks.

Given the government’s track record on managing finances, including simple tasks like balancing a checkbook, the notion the government is either trustworthy, or competent, to successfully carry out such a task is debatable; some might say laughable.

“We’ve found in other areas of the financial world that strong, clear, concise disclosures are critical to earning the long-term trust and confidence of consumers,” said Lawsky. In other words, Lawsky wants Bitcoin exchanges to disclose the risks associated with virtual transactions.

Requesting exchanges provide potential users with facts regarding risks seems reasonable, but to insinuate government regulation is necessary to gain consumer trust is reaching.

If Lawsky’s statement were true, that would mean corporate banks have been nothing but honest to their customers, therefore gaining trust.

I bet many would beg to differ.

The initial idea behind the development of bitcoin was to escape government regulated currency, and develop one that would provide financial freedom to its users.

Enter Dark Wallet

A group of coders, including Cody Wilson, the mastermind behind printing 3D weapons, and Bitcoin project developer Amir Taaki, may be just one step ahead of the government when it comes to tracking the digital currency.

The coders refer to themselves as the unSystem.

Launched on Indiegogo, unSystem developed software capable of concealing bitcoin footprints, preventing its route from being tracked when transactions are made. Engadget explains how a “one-two punch” of encryption and “CoinJoin” technology makes this possible.

“In brief, the latter code registers multiple transactions as a single movement of funds, masking transfers,” reported Engadget.

Acting out of defiance, the team admitted the main purpose of the software, cleverly named the Dark Wallet, is to carry out “illicit transactions” similar to those that previously took place on the Silk Road website. The name itself is a play on the fear law enforcement officials once expressed that hackers and criminals would use technology to “go dark” and avoid government surveillance.

Silk Road was an underground website that supported a black market, including the sale of illegal drugs. It has since been shut down and the alleged site runner, Ross Ulbricht, is in jail awaiting his trial. Ulbricht is being federally charged with drug trafficking and money laundering.

The Dark Wallet is reportedly “…designed to protect its users’ identities far more strongly than the partial privacy protections bitcoin offers in its current form,” reported Wired.

“If the program works as promised, it could neuter impending bitcoin regulations that seek to tie individuals’ identities to bitcoin ownership.”

Law enforcement is watching

The New York Department of Financial Services, in which Lawsky is superintendent, failed to respond to requests for comment.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, however, did respond to Wired Magazine stating they are, “well aware of the many emerging technological efforts designed to subvert financial transparency. It’s certainly our business to be interested and vigilant with respect to any activities that may assist money laundering and other financial crim


Op Ed: SEC’s Latest Declaration Creates Legal Minefield for Digital Assets

This broad, authoritative declaration is not unexpected, as, to date, the SEC has stated that all digital assets — regardless of whether they function as alt coins or utility tokens — are securities at least initially and, thus, subject to its jurisdiction.

Huhnsik Chung and Nicholas Secara

Op Ed: Cryptocurrency’s Unrealized Opportunities for U.S. Tax Professionals

Tax accountants and firms that specialize in cryptocurrency will emerge to capture and service this market. The first movers will be the ones who stand to capture the oversized profits.

David Kemmerer

Op Ed: Anatomy of the Tether Attack: Are Stablecoins Vulnerable?

Last month's attack on Tether contains a cautionary tale: Only those coins that can survive such attacks have the slightest chance of becoming the “holy grail" of stablecoins.

Henry He

Op Ed: 10 Takeaways From Recent French Guidance on Blockchain and the GDPR

The CNIL wisely points out, “Blockchain is not always the best technology for all processing of data; it may be the source of difficulties for the controller with respect to its GDPR obligations.”

Laura Jehl